As we contemplate the massive $40 billion transfer of U.S. taxpayer funds to Ukraine, a few things need to be emphasized.
- Der Lebensmittel-Lieferservice Tiggy verspricht, Bestellungen in nur 15 Minuten zu liefern
- The Sexual Assault Lawsuit Against Don Lemon Has Suddenly Been Dropped
- PlayStation’s Essential Picks sale offers games up to 75 percent off
- NOXPLAYER VERSION UPDATE V7.0.2.5
- 6 numbers represent 5 crypto records in 2021
First, congress has decided to pay the salaries, benefits and pensions of Ukraine political officials and citizens. As U.S. citizens try and figure out how to afford housing, gasoline, food and basic goods, congress has decided to subsidize another country. That’s the first point.
Bạn Đang Xem: The Pentagon Testified Assessing Ukraine and No One Noticed
Second, as to the pragmatic question of “to what end?” There was a critical point made last week by Defense Intel Agency (DIA) Director Lt. Gen. Scott Berrier, that not a single media outlet or politician discussed. During his briefing to the Senate Armed Services Committee, Berrier was asked “can Ukraine win” the conflict against Russia?
Xem Thêm : Google arbeitet an einer Android-Funktion, um unbekannte Tracker in der Nähe zu erkennen
Lt. General Berrier replied: “That is a difficult predication to make. I think where the assessment is at, is a prolonged stalemate should no factor change on either side. In other words, the Russians continue to do what they’re doing, and we continue to do what we are doing for the Ukranians.” WATCH:
The Pentagon assessment is the best that can be achieved is a stalemate. Billions of billions of dollars being poured into Ukraine, and the most likely outcome is a stalemate. More people killed, an endless need for continued money to be poured into the ‘war’, and the best possible outcome is a stalemate.
So, riddle me this, why isn’t the U.S. policy position advocating for Zelenskyy and Putin to enter negotiations for a resolution?
Xem Thêm : Oasis Network (ROSE) & NEAR Protocol (NEAR) đạt ATH mới
What possible U.S. interest can be advanced, knowing the only outcome is a stalemate, where people are killed on either side and money spent on a proxy conflict that ends in loggerheads at some distant point months from now?
Also, why has no U.S. media outlet or pundit played the remarks and assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency, so that the American people can understand the intent of U.S. policy?

The source: https://nguyendiep.com
Category: news